Armstrong v. Amtrak
This text of Armstrong v. Amtrak (Armstrong v. Amtrak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOSEPH E. ARMSTRONG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-0440 (RJL) ) AMTRAK, INC., ) , F I L E D Defendant. ) JUN 03 2015
MEMORAND OPINION Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia (June: 2,20%) [Dkt. #10]
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #10]. Because a ruling on the motion potentially could have disposed of this case, the Court advised the pro se plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the rules ofthis Court. Specifically, the Court advised the plaintiff that, ifhe did not respond to the Motion by May 22, 2015, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff has neither filed an opposition to the Motion nor requested more time in which to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss as conceded, and will deny its Motion for
Summary Judgment without prejudice. An Order accompanies this Memorandum
'4 RICHARD J. L
United States District Judge
Oplmon. t
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Armstrong v. Amtrak, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-amtrak-dcd-2015.