Armstrong v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armstrong v. Allstate Indemnity Co.

653 So. 2d 1121, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4225, 1995 WL 232894

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 21, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1465

StatusPublished

This text of 653 So. 2d 1121 (Armstrong v. Allstate Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 653 So. 2d 1121, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4225, 1995 WL 232894 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of final summary judgment in favor of appellee Allstate Indemnity Company (“Allstate”). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Under Florida law, where an insured settles with a third-party tortfeasor in violation of a nonsettlement provision, the insurer is presumed to have been prejudiced. Watherwax v. Allstate Ins. Co., 538 So.2d 108, 109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); General Accident Insurance Co. v. Taplis, 493 So.2d 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). However, this is a rebuttable presumption, with the burden on the insured to show that the breach did not in fact prejudice the insurer. Watherwax, supra.

Here, Allstate, by establishing that appellants Steven and Susan Armstrong [1122]*1122(“Armstrong”) executed a settlement without their written consent, raised the presumption of prejudice and carried its burden of showing the nonexistence of material facts in issue. However, in rebuttal, Armstrong presented deposition testimony of the tortfeasor Donnie Lovett (“Lovett”) which set forth facts about Lovett’s age, income, education, and general inability to pay an adverse judgment. We hold that the specific facts presented were sufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Allstate was prejudiced by the release of the tortfea-sor, i.e., whether Lovett was and will remain “judgment-proof.” See, e.g., Watherwax, supra. As such, summary judgment was improperly granted. See, e.g., Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985).

We REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of final summary judgment in favor of appellee Allstate Indemnity Company (“Allstate”). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Under Florida law, where an insured settles with a third-party tortfeasor in violation of a nonsettlement provision, the insurer is presumed to have been prejudiced. Watherwax v. Allstate Ins. Co., 538 So.2d 108, 109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); General Accident Insurance Co. v. Taplis, 493 So.2d 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). However, this is a rebuttable presumption, with the burden on the insured to show that the breach did not in fact prejudice the insurer. Watherwax, supra.

Here, Allstate, by establishing that appellants Steven and Susan Armstrong [1122]*1122(“Armstrong”) executed a settlement without their written consent, raised the presumption of prejudice and carried its burden of showing the nonexistence of material facts in issue. However, in rebuttal, Armstrong presented deposition testimony of the tortfeasor Donnie Lovett (“Lovett”) which set forth facts about Lovett’s age, income, education, and general inability to pay an adverse judgment. We hold that the specific facts presented were sufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Allstate was prejudiced by the release of the tortfea-sor, i.e., whether Lovett was and will remain “judgment-proof.” See, e.g., Watherwax, supra. As such, summary judgment was improperly granted. See, e.g., Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985).

We REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 So. 2d 1121, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4225, 1995 WL 232894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-allstate-indemnity-co-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack