Armstrong Rubber Co. v. United States
Opinion
This motion for a stay pending appeal raises the same issues as were recently discussed in American Grape Growers Alliance v. United States, 9 CIT 505, Slip Op. 85-104 (Oct. 7, 1985).
Here too, the Court finds that there is a fair possibility of damage to plaintiffs from the granting of a stay, in terms of the continued deprivation of an administrative investigation into their alleged injury. There is no comparable harm to anyone else, and a strong public interest in the uninterrupted progress of these investigations.
For these reasons, the motion for a stay is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
9 Ct. Int'l Trade 519 (Armstrong Rubber Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.