Armstrong McCall, LP v. Amcobeauty Corporation
This text of Armstrong McCall, LP v. Amcobeauty Corporation (Armstrong McCall, LP v. Amcobeauty Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-08-00680-CV
Armstrong McCall, LP, Appellant
v.
Amcobeauty Corporation, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-08–003311, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Armstrong McCall, LP has filed Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss
Interlocutory Appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.
G. Alan Waldrop, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson
Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion
Filed: January 7, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Armstrong McCall, LP v. Amcobeauty Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-mccall-lp-v-amcobeauty-corporation-texapp-2009.