Armstrong, Kenneth Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2010
DocketWR-73,700-01
StatusPublished

This text of Armstrong, Kenneth Ray (Armstrong, Kenneth Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong, Kenneth Ray, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-73,700-01
EX PARTE KENNETH RAY ARMSTRONG, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2006-CR-8495 IN THE 144TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Armstrong v. State, No. 04-07-00767-CR (Tex. App.-San Antonio, March 4, 2009).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he advised Applicant to testify when the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction until Applicant's own testimony and because having Applicant testify allowed the jury to hear about his prior convictions. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant's trial counsel regarding Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether counsel's advice to Applicant that he should testify amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel given the circumstances of this case. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: April 28, 2010

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Lemke
13 S.W.3d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Armstrong, Kenneth Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-kenneth-ray-texcrimapp-2010.