Armstrong Grocer Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service, Inc.

132 So. 696, 101 Fla. 668
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 5, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in ¡ this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Tyler vs. Akerman, et al., 85 Fla. 185, 96 Sou. 838, and cases there cited. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong Grocer Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service, Inc., 132 So. 696, 101 Fla. 668 (Fla. 1931).

132 So. 696 (Armstrong Grocer Co. v. Smith-Alford Sign Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Baron
269 So. 2d 45 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Ake v. Chancey
13 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)