Armstrong

Court of Claims

Armstrong

196 Ct. Cl. 776, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 34, 1971 WL 4158

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 29, 1971

DocketNo. 86-71

StatusPublished

This text of 196 Ct. Cl. 776 (Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong, 196 Ct. Cl. 776, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 34, 1971 WL 4158 (cc 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian pay. — Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment declaring that his removal from his position with the Veterans’ Administration was in violation of laws and regulations and is null and void; that an injunction be issued enjoining defendant from continuing to refuse to consider plaintiff’s removal as a violation of laws and regulations and therefore a nullity; and that he be reinstated in said position. Plaintiff [777]*777also alleges that defendant performed an act of fraud upon the Court of Claims to obtain judgment against him in Armstrong v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 539, 405 F. 2d 1275 (1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 934. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff has not properly alleged or raised any triable issue of fraud. On October 29, 1971, by order, the court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay. — Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment declaring that his removal from his position with the Veterans’ Administration was in violation of laws and regulations and is null and void; that an injunction be issued enjoining defendant from continuing to refuse to consider plaintiff’s removal as a violation of laws and regulations and therefore a nullity; and that he be reinstated in said position. Plaintiff [777]*777also alleges that defendant performed an act of fraud upon the Court of Claims to obtain judgment against him in Armstrong v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 539, 405 F. 2d 1275 (1969), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 934. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff has not properly alleged or raised any triable issue of fraud. On October 29, 1971, by order, the court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Ct. Cl. 776, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 34, 1971 WL 4158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-cc-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack