Armster v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

207 Ill. App. 514
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 24, 1917·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Contracts, § 166* — when duty of courts to enforce as made. It is not within the province of a court to make contracts, but it is the duty of the court to enforce contracts as made, unless public policy would prevent such enforcement. 2. Insurance, § 86* — what is nature of life insurance policy. A life insurance policy payable to a beneficiary named therein is a species of property; it is in the nature of a chose in action which, subject to certain conditions, varying according to the terms of a contract, is payable upon the contingency of death or at a stated time. 3. Courts, § 150* — when decisions of Supreme Court are controlling. Where there is a conflict in the decisions of the federal courts or any other courts with the decisions of the higher courts of the State, it is the duty of all State courts to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court of the State. 4. Insurance, § 407* — what is effect of legal execution of insured on rights of heneftciary. The legal execution of an insured does not, on grounds of public policy, forfeit the rights of the beneficiary of an insurance policy issued upon the life of such person, where there is no limitation as to the manner of death in such policy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armster v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 207 Ill. App. 514 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

207 Ill. App. 514 (Armster v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corey v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
178 S.E. 525 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1935)
Allen v. Diamond
13 F.2d 579 (Seventh Circuit, 1926)