Armstead v. State

48 S.W.2d 1002, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 1932
DocketNo. 15245
StatusPublished

This text of 48 S.W.2d 1002 (Armstead v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstead v. State, 48 S.W.2d 1002, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932 (Tex. 1932).

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is selling intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

[1003]*1003In pronouncing sentence the court failed to gire effect to the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law. The sentence is'reformed in order that it may be shown that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more than two years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 S.W.2d 1002, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstead-v-state-texcrimapp-1932.