Armstead v. Collins

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20706

Summary Calendar

__________________

WILLIE D. ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JACK KYLE

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-94-2140

- - - - - - - - - -

February 8, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Armstead appeals from the district court's order granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment in his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He argues that the defendants violated his rights to due process, equal protection, and the Ex Post Facto Clause in calculating his parole eligibility and his parole review date. We have reviewed the record and the district

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 95-20706

-2-

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons given by the district court.

AFFIRMED.