Armson v. Forsyth
40 Ill. 49
This text of 40 Ill. 49 (Armson v. Forsyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Armson v. Forsyth, 40 Ill. 49 (Ill. 1867).
Opinion
It is essential to the sufficiency of the appeal bond that it should be executed by the plaintiff. It will not suffice that it be executed by the landlord of the plaintiff, although the suit was in reference to the possession of premises which the plaintiff claimed the right to hold as tenant of the party executing the bond.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 Ill. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armson-v-forsyth-ill-1867.