Armour v. . White
This text of 3 N.C. 87 (Armour v. . White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The possession of part of a tract, circumscribed by marked lines, is a possession of the whole tract within these lines. If the defendants possessed the part mentioned in the evidence, claiming under Guthrie's patent, their possession extends to the lines of that patent and no farther; but if they possessed this part claiming as far as the lines of the 100-acre tract, then their possession extends to the whole tract. A naked possession for seven years, without entry or claim, will bar the right of entry of all adverse claimants; and a possession with color of title for seven years will give to the defendant in possession an absolute right against all others forever.
Verdict and judgment for the defendant.
NOTE. — See this case, ante, 69, and see the note to the case ofStrudwick v. Shaw,
(97)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.C. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-v-white-ncsuperct-1799.