Armour v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 376
United States Customs Court·Decided May 13, 1959·No. No. 63051; protest 326041-K (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

[377]*377Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et at. (45 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armour v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 376 (cusc 1959).

42 Cust. Ct. 376 (Armour v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A.
45 C.C.P.A. 20 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1957)