Armour v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 376
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 13, 1959
DocketNo. 63051; protest 326041-K (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 376 (Armour v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armour v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 376 (cusc 1959).

Opinion

[377]*377Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et at. (45 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A.
45 C.C.P.A. 20 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Cust. Ct. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-v-united-states-cusc-1959.