Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Armour v. McMiller

Armour v. McMiller

93 So. 3d 533, 2012 WL 3136238, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12648
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 2012
DocketNo. 5D10-3088
StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 533 (Armour v. McMiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armour v. McMiller, 93 So. 3d 533, 2012 WL 3136238, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12648 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alione Armour appeals from the final judgment of paternity directing him to pay child support to Kelly MeMiller. We affirm the trial court’s rulings in all regards. However, we remand with instruction to conform the child support calculations in the written judgment to the court’s oral pronouncements. See Goosby v. Lawrence, 711 So.2d 577, 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instruction.

SAWAYA, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goosby v. Lawrence
711 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 So. 3d 533, 2012 WL 3136238, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-v-mcmiller-fladistctapp-2012.