Armour v. Armour

123 N.E.2d 90, 307 N.Y. 896, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1578
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to all respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the trust fund; no opinion.

Concur: Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froesset. and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armour v. Armour, 123 N.E.2d 90, 307 N.Y. 896, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1578 (N.Y. 1954).

123 N.E.2d 90 (Armour v. Armour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Final Accounting of O'Shea
21 Misc. 2d 597 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)