Armour Packing Co. v. Lovell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Armour Packing Co. v. Lovell

44 S.E. 990, 118 Ga. 164, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 483

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 1, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 44 S.E. 990 (Armour Packing Co. v. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armour Packing Co. v. Lovell, 44 S.E. 990, 118 Ga. 164, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 483 (Ga. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. An execution against “ James E. Eeps, agent for the Armour Packing Co.,” is against James E. Leps alone, the words, “ agent for,” etc.,, being merely descriptio personæ. Maxwell v. Collier, 115 Ga. 304.

2. Where a party has an adequate remedy by claim, the successful prosecution, of which would be as effectual as the equitable proceeding, he is not entitled to an injunction, Beysiegel v. Rome Mutual Loan Association 113 Ga. 1071.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI