Armour Creameries v. Parish

Supreme Court of Florida

Armour Creameries v. Parish

203 So. 2d 157

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 11, 1967

DocketNo. 36633

StatusPublished

This text of 203 So. 2d 157 (Armour Creameries v. Parish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armour Creameries v. Parish, 203 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

Wé find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for the respondent Jessie V. Parish is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI