Armour Company v. Price

37 S.E.2d 634, 73 Ga. App. 676, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 381
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 3, 1946·No. 31201.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Parker, J.

1. The award-made by a single director, and affirmed upon review by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, and by the superior court on appeal, was supported by the evidence, and in the absence of fraud such award is conclusive and cannot be set aside by this court. See Davis v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., 72 Ga. App. 783 (35 S. E. 2d, 203), and Reeves v. Royal Indemnity Co., 73 Ga.App. 2 (35 S. E. 2d, 473).

2. There was ample evidence to support the finding' that the claimant was justified in refusing- the employment offered after the injury was sustained, and the claimant was not barred from receiving compensation because of the provisions of the Code, § 114-407.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, P. J., and Felton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armour Company v. Price, 37 S.E.2d 634, 73 Ga. App. 676, 1946 Ga. App. LEXIS 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 1946).

37 S.E.2d 634 (Armour Company v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALABAMA v. Bass
58 S.E.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Atlantic Company v. Streetman
48 S.E.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)