Armour & Co. v. Youngblood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Armour & Co. v. Youngblood

147 S.E.2d 351, 113 Ga. App. 73, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 972

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 19, 1966

Docket41628

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 S.E.2d 351 (Armour & Co. v. Youngblood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armour & Co. v. Youngblood, 147 S.E.2d 351, 113 Ga. App. 73, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 972 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinions

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The holding in Armour & Co. v. Young-blood, 107 Ga. App. 605 (130 SE2d 786), a former appearance of the same case before this court, constitutes the law of the ease. Since occurrence of the facts there recited, the employer again discontinued paying the compensation, and the claimant filed another petition pursuant to Code § 114-711 in Tift Superior Court, which rendered judgment for claimant for accrued compensation for the period from November 20, 1961, to August 3, 1965, in accordance with the approved agreement of March 31, 1959. Error is enumerated on this judgment of the trial court. It does not appear in the record that the approved agreement has at any time been modified, set aside, or terminated in any of the ways provided by law. The only difference between the former case and this one is that here additional compensation has accrued to the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The holding in Armour & Co. v. Young-blood, 107 Ga. App. 605 (130 SE2d 786), a former appearance of the same case before this court, constitutes the law of the ease. Since occurrence of the facts there recited, the employer again discontinued paying the compensation, and the claimant filed another petition pursuant to Code § 114-711 in Tift Superior Court, which rendered judgment for claimant for accrued compensation for the period from November 20, 1961, to August 3, 1965, in accordance with the approved agreement of March 31, 1959. Error is enumerated on this judgment of the trial court. It does not appear in the record that the approved agreement has at any time been modified, set aside, or terminated in any of the ways provided by law. The only difference between the former case and this one is that here additional compensation has accrued to the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E.2d 351, 113 Ga. App. 73, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-co-v-youngblood-gactapp-1966.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack