Armour & Co. v. United States

215 F. 585, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1273
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 1914
DocketNo. 297
StatusPublished

This text of 215 F. 585 (Armour & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armour & Co. v. United States, 215 F. 585, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1273 (2d Cir. 1914).

Opinion

COXE, Circuit Judge.

In view of our decision in the case of the United States against Thirteen Crates of Frozen Eggs, 215 Fed. 584, 131 C. C. A. [586]*586652, decided at this term, it Is hardly to be expected that a conclusion in favor of the plaintiff in error would be reached 'herein even if we were permitted to review the questions presented at the argument and in the briefs. But we are not permitted to review these questions because there is no bill of exceptions. None of the questions discussed is properly before us.

The writ of error is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thirteen Crates of Frozen Eggs
215 F. 584 (Second Circuit, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 F. 585, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-co-v-united-states-ca2-1914.