Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.A.

Second Circuit

Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.A.

263 F.2d 323

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 4, 1959·No. No. 90, Docket 25056·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 147, 149; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 147, 149; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.

Affirmed.

Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.A., 263 F.2d 323 (2d Cir. 1959).

Pincite

263 F.2d 323 (Armour & Co. v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related