Armour and Company v. Emery Industries, Inc.

433 F.2d 821
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedNovember 19, 1970
Docket8382
StatusPublished

This text of 433 F.2d 821 (Armour and Company v. Emery Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armour and Company v. Emery Industries, Inc., 433 F.2d 821 (ccpa 1970).

Opinion

433 F.2d 821

ARMOUR AND COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
EMERY INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.

Patent Appeal No. 8382.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

November 19, 1970.

Appeal from Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Opposition No. 45,936.

Richard E. Alexander, Alexander & Speckman, Chicago, Ill., George A. Arkwright, Arlington, Va., attorneys of record, for appellant.

Lewis H. Lanman, John D. Rice, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and RE, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the transcript of record, the briefs, the arguments on appeal, and our recent decision in Technic, Inc. v. Sel-Rex Corporation, Cust. & Pat. App., 419 F.2d 1331 (1970), cited by the appellant, we find no error in the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 156 USPQ 689 (1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Technic, Inc. v. Sel-Rex Corporation
419 F.2d 1331 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1970)
Palmer v. United States
182 Ct. Cl. 896 (Court of Claims, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 F.2d 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-and-company-v-emery-industries-inc-ccpa-1970.