Armor v. State
This text of 27 S.E.2d 107 (Armor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of operating a lottery, known as “the number game.” The evidence authorized the jury to find that he was aiding and abetting in the operation of the lottery, and, the offense being a misdemeanor, that he was guilty as a principal.
The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari based solely upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 S.E.2d 107, 70 Ga. App. 13, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armor-v-state-gactapp-1943.