Armor v. State

53 S.E. 815, 125 Ga. 3, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 4
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 22, 1906·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

(After stating the facts.) Our rulings are sufficiently stated in the headnotes. There is no controversy that the juror was disqualified. The right to set aside a juror under such circumstances and to continue the case, if there be ground for it, is settled. See Penal Code, § 973, par. 4; Jackson v. State, 51 Ga. 402. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armor v. State, 53 S.E. 815, 125 Ga. 3, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 4 (Ga. 1906).

53 S.E. 815 (Armor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Romeo
203 A.2d 23 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964)
Walker v. State
90 S.E. 1041 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Minyard v. State
87 S.E. 710 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)