Armor v. Holly

Supreme Court of Missouri

Armor v. Holly

126 S.W. 495, 226 Mo. 688, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 85

DecidedMarch 15, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.W. 495 (Armor v. Holly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armor v. Holly, 126 S.W. 495, 226 Mo. 688, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 85 (Mo. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

FOX, J.

This is a companion case to Armor et al., Appellants, v. Joseph Frey, Respondent, reported at page 646 of this Report, in which the opinion was announced at the present sitting of this court. This case involves substantially the same propositions presented in Armor v. Frey. We fully presented our views upon the questions involved in the Prey case, which must be held decisive of the propositions disclosed by the record in this case.

Following the conclusions reached in the first case, it results that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded, and it is so ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOX, J.

This is a companion case to Armor et al., Appellants, v. Joseph Frey, Respondent, reported at page 646 of this Report, in which the opinion was announced at the present sitting of this court. This case involves substantially the same propositions presented in Armor v. Frey. We fully presented our views upon the questions involved in the Prey case, which must be held decisive of the propositions disclosed by the record in this case.

Following the conclusions reached in the first case, it results that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded, and it is so ordered.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.W. 495, 226 Mo. 688, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armor-v-holly-mo-1910.