Armondo Dominguez v. Kitty M. Hawk
This text of 887 F.2d 1078 (Armondo Dominguez v. Kitty M. Hawk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
887 F.2d 1078
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Armondo DOMINGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Kitty M. HAWK, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 89-7622.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 25, 1989.
Decided: Sept. 26, 1989.
Armondo Dominguez, appellant pro se.
Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Armondo Dominguez appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dominguez v. Hawk, C/A No. 89-207-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
887 F.2d 1078, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14353, 1989 WL 117903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armondo-dominguez-v-kitty-m-hawk-ca4-1989.