Armlin v. Spickerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Armlin v. Spickerman

250 A.D. 810, 294 N.Y.S. 159, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9079

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 810 (Armlin v. Spickerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armlin v. Spickerman, 250 A.D. 810, 294 N.Y.S. 159, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9079 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants have appealed from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court denying their application to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff, an infant fourteen years of age, was an attendant at Central School District No. 1 in Schoharie county. Defendants undertook to transport her and other school children to and from their homes. The complaint alleges that while plaintiff was being transported to her home in January, 1936, because of defendants’ negligence in failing to properly equip the vehicle used in transportation of plaintiff her feet were frozen. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants have appealed from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court denying their application to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiff, an infant fourteen years of age, was an attendant at Central School District No. 1 in Schoharie county. Defendants undertook to transport her and other school children to and from their homes. The complaint alleges that while plaintiff was being transported to her home in January, 1936, because of defendants’ negligence in failing to properly equip the vehicle used in transportation of plaintiff her feet were frozen. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 810, 294 N.Y.S. 159, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armlin-v-spickerman-nyappdiv-1937.