Armitage's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Armitage's Estate

46 A. 117, 195 Pa. 582, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 689

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 30, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 86

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 46 A. 117 (Armitage's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armitage's Estate, 46 A. 117, 195 Pa. 582, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 689 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The reasons given by the auditor in his report for dismissing the exceptions to the accounts filed, are so entirely satisfactory that we sustain them as they are there expressed. There is no doubt whatever that all the parties interested agreed in writing to all the payments of principal, to the removal of the securities, to the investments which were made by G. Barton Armitage, and to the receipt by Simpson as administrator c. t. a. of those that were left. These parties were all competent to make the agreements referred to, and as the principal of the estate had been encroached upon and used for their own, and their mother’s support, it was eminently right and proper to do just as they [589]*589did in the execution of the papers in question. The assignments of error are dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The reasons given by the auditor in his report for dismissing the exceptions to the accounts filed, are so entirely satisfactory that we sustain them as they are there expressed. There is no doubt whatever that all the parties interested agreed in writing to all the payments of principal, to the removal of the securities, to the investments which were made by G. Barton Armitage, and to the receipt by Simpson as administrator c. t. a. of those that were left. These parties were all competent to make the agreements referred to, and as the principal of the estate had been encroached upon and used for their own, and their mother’s support, it was eminently right and proper to do just as they [589]*589did in the execution of the papers in question. The assignments of error are dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A. 117, 195 Pa. 582, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armitages-estate-pa-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack