Armitage v. Town of Huntington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Armitage v. Town of Huntington

4 A.D.2d 948, 167 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4099

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 948 (Armitage v. Town of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armitage v. Town of Huntington, 4 A.D.2d 948, 167 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a judgment declaring invalid an amendment to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Huntington, which established a “ Generating Station District ”, and declaring invalid an amendment to said ordinance and the building zone map which rezoned approximately 250 acres from an existing residential district to- the newly established district, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denying appellants’ cross motion for summary judgment. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a judgment declaring invalid an amendment to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Huntington, which established a “ Generating Station District ”, and declaring invalid an amendment to said ordinance and the building zone map which rezoned approximately 250 acres from an existing residential district to- the newly established district, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denying appellants’ cross motion for summary judgment. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 948, 167 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armitage-v-town-of-huntington-nyappdiv-1957.