Armitage v. Lizza & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Armitage v. Lizza & Sons, Inc.

25 A.D.2d 679, 269 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4665

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 679 (Armitage v. Lizza & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armitage v. Lizza & Sons, Inc., 25 A.D.2d 679, 269 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for injury to real property caused by negligent work during the course of construction of an abutting road, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 15, 1965, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed that the action be placed on the Pretrial Calendar for settlement conference or assignment for trial of the issues of damages. Order affirmed, without costs. The action is based on negligence and seeks recovery of compensatory damages, not damages for intentional wrong.

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for injury to real property caused by negligent work during the course of construction of an abutting road, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 15, 1965, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed that the action be placed on the Pretrial Calendar for settlement conference or assignment for trial of the issues of damages. Order affirmed, without costs. The action is based on negligence and seeks recovery of compensatory damages, not damages for intentional wrong.

Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 679, 269 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armitage-v-lizza-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1966.