Armistead v. Bernard

62 Miss. 180
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Section 2633 of the Code of 1880 only forbids the institution of an action of replevin to recover property held by an officer by virtue of an execution or attachment. It has no application to a controversy between private individuals, even though the defendant claims as a purchaser under a sale made by the officer.

While the property remains in the hands of the officer, the party must interpose, his claim in the manner prescribed by the statute,, but a failure to so present and prosecute his claim does not operate as a waiver of his title, which may be asserted against any party in whose possession the property may be thereafter found.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armistead v. Bernard, 62 Miss. 180 (Mich. 1884).

62 Miss. 180 (Armistead v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woolner & Lowenstein v. Spalding ex rel. Heard
65 Miss. 204 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1887)