Arminius Chemical Co. v. Acme Mfg. Co.
This text of 275 F. 1021 (Arminius Chemical Co. v. Acme Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of this court on a previous appeal, Acme Mfg. Co. v. Arminius Chemical Co., 264 Fed. 27, is the law of the case, in accordance with which another trial has been had, and the resulting judgment should be affirmed, unless the facts now before us are materially different. It is enough to say, without reviewing the evidence, that careful comparison discloses no substantial variance. On the vital issues the proofs at the second trial were essentially the same as at the first. The case is therefore governed by our former decision. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 F. 1021, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arminius-chemical-co-v-acme-mfg-co-ca4-1921.