Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co.
This text of Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co. (Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
____________________________________________________________
ARMINDA GARZA, Appellant,
ARTURO GARZA AND NEW
BERN TRANSPORT CO., Appellees.
______________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 206th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-618-06-D. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have settled their dispute in controversy. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 20th day of August, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arminda-garza-v-arturo-garza-and-new-bern-transpor-texapp-2009.