Armes v. Talbot County

522 F. App'x 185
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2013
DocketNo. 12-2451
StatusPublished

This text of 522 F. App'x 185 (Armes v. Talbot County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armes v. Talbot County, 522 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Lee Armes appeals from the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to the Defendant on his employment and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[186]*186sons stated by the district court. Armes v. Talbot Cnty., Md., No. 1:11-cv-03S15-ELH, 2012 WL 5869311 (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 F. App'x 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armes-v-talbot-county-ca4-2013.