Armes v. Talbot County

Fourth Circuit

Armes v. Talbot County

522 F. App'x 185

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. 12-2451·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Lee Armes appeals from the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to the Defendant on his employment and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[186] sons stated by the district court. Armes v. Talbot Cnty., Md., No. 1:11-cv-03S15-ELH, 2012 WL 5869311 (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Lee Armes appeals from the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to the Defendant on his employment and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[186] sons stated by the district court. Armes v. Talbot Cnty., Md., No. 1:11-cv-03S15-ELH, 2012 WL 5869311 (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Armes v. Talbot County, 522 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

522 F. App'x 185 (Armes v. Talbot County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.