Armes v. Pierce Governor Co.
This text of 112 N.E.2d 241 (Armes v. Pierce Governor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This court decided this appeal in favor of appellant October 15,1951. Armes v. The Pierce Gov[491]*491ernor Company, Inc. (1951), 121 Ind. App. 566, 101 N. E. 2d 199.
A statement of costs was sent appellee by the Clerk of this court on November 15, 1951 and January 17, 1952. On April 28, 1953 appellee filed its motion to re-tax the costs. In Howard et al. v. Robinette et al. (1952), 123 Ind. App. 206, 109 N. E. 2d 432, we held a motion to retax costs should be filed in a reasonable time after final decision. Appellee’s motion was not filed in a reasonable time. Therefore, its motion is overruled.
Note. — Reported in 112 N. E. 2d 241.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 N.E.2d 241, 123 Ind. App. 490, 1953 Ind. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armes-v-pierce-governor-co-indctapp-1953.