Armentrout v. Anthem Cas. Ins. Co.
This text of 2001 Ohio 153 (Armentrout v. Anthem Cas. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 88.]
ARMENTROUT ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ANTHEM CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as Armentrout v. Anthem Cas. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio-153.] Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (No. 01-296—Submitted May 30, 2001—Decided June 20, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 2000CA00033. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 262, 744 N.E.2d 713. MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., dissent. __________________ Robert E. Kerper, Jr., for appellees. Lane, Alton & Horst and Todd A. Cook, for appellant. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2001 Ohio 153, 92 Ohio St. 3d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armentrout-v-anthem-cas-ins-co-ohio-2001.