Armenis v. Cramer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armenis v. Cramer

611 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13134, 1992 WL 389052

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 31, 1992

DocketNo. 92-2411

StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 584 (Armenis v. Cramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armenis v. Cramer, 611 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13134, 1992 WL 389052 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Petitioner, Spiro Armenis and two corporations controlled by him, Financial Futures Management Corporation and EGYB, Inc., have been sued for fraud, breach of contract and civil theft arising out of a real estate transaction. Respondent, the plaintiff below, principally contends that Armen-is fraudulently induced him to provide an irrevocable letter of credit as security for a loan to the corporations to fund certain real estate purchase deposits. The loan was drawn down in April, 1988.

Respondent succeeded in obtaining an order from the trial court compelling Armen-is to produce his 1988 and 1989 tax returns — on the theory that if he personally ended up with the $300,000 it should be shown as “income” on his tax returns. Respondent also succeeded in obtaining an order requiring Armenis to produce all his bank records for the same period because it “may evidence the deposit of the money into one of his accounts”. Perplexed as we are by these relevancy arguments,¹ based on the record before us,² we are unable to conclude this question is not controlled by Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987) and Short v. Fleetwood Motor Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc., 511 So.2d 747 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we are bound to deny the writ.

WRIT DENIED.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Petitioner, Spiro Armenis and two corporations controlled by him, Financial Futures Management Corporation and EGYB, Inc., have been sued for fraud, breach of contract and civil theft arising out of a real estate transaction. Respondent, the plaintiff below, principally contends that Armen-is fraudulently induced him to provide an irrevocable letter of credit as security for a loan to the corporations to fund certain real estate purchase deposits. The loan was drawn down in April, 1988.

Respondent succeeded in obtaining an order from the trial court compelling Armen-is to produce his 1988 and 1989 tax returns — on the theory that if he personally ended up with the $300,000 it should be shown as “income” on his tax returns. Respondent also succeeded in obtaining an order requiring Armenis to produce all his bank records for the same period because it “may evidence the deposit of the money into one of his accounts”. Perplexed as we are by these relevancy arguments,¹ based on the record before us,² we are unable to conclude this question is not controlled by Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987) and Short v. Fleetwood Motor Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc., 511 So.2d 747 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we are bound to deny the writ.

WRIT DENIED.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

611 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13134, 1992 WL 389052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armenis-v-cramer-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack