Armenian Relief Society, Inc. v. Kevorkian
Opinion
This is an appeal from a probate judge’s denial of a motion to frame jury issues on a petition for the allowance of a will. The case was heard on oral statements of counsel. The judge made a report of material facts in which he found “that there was no doubtful question of fact supported by evidence.” The prospective evidence is reported. We have examined the entire record in the light of the [736] familiar principles of law governing such cases (Seiferth v. Hay, 352 Mass. 768 [1967]; Kozlowski v. Golis, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 797 [1974]) and have concluded that there was no error in the judge’s denial of the motion. See Foye v. King, 340 Mass. 787 (1960); DiMaggio v. Verdone, 358 Mass. 810 (1970).
Order denying motion affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
325 N.E.2d 599 (Armenian Relief Society, Inc. v. Kevorkian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.