Armco Steel Corporation v. United States Steel Corporation

Third Circuit

Armco Steel Corporation v. United States Steel Corporation

316 F.2d 472, 137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 329, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5496

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 23, 1963·No. 14117·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have before us on appeal the validity of three United States patents which expired before the trial in the court below and which were found to be both invalid and not infringed by the defendant.

We have carefully reviewed the extensive record and have weighed the arguments of the respective parties as. appears from their briefs and at the full hearing. We entertain no doubt that the patents are invalidated by the prior art and that there was no infringement. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have before us on appeal the validity of three United States patents which expired before the trial in the court below and which were found to be both invalid and not infringed by the defendant.

We have carefully reviewed the extensive record and have weighed the arguments of the respective parties as. appears from their briefs and at the full hearing. We entertain no doubt that the patents are invalidated by the prior art and that there was no infringement. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Armco Steel Corporation v. United States Steel Corporation, 316 F.2d 472, 137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 329, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5496 (3d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

316 F.2d 472 (Armco Steel Corporation v. United States Steel Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related