Armco Steel Corporation v. Burleigh County, North Dakota

376 F.2d 215, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6789, 1967 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,060
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1967
Docket18187_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 376 F.2d 215 (Armco Steel Corporation v. Burleigh County, North Dakota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armco Steel Corporation v. Burleigh County, North Dakota, 376 F.2d 215, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6789, 1967 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,060 (8th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This, like Armco Steel Corp. v. Adams County, 8 Cir., 376 F.2d 212, decided concurrently herewith, is an appeal by Armco from the separate treble-damage judgments rendered in favor of a number of North Dakota Counties for injury from violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. As in the Adams County case, the violation relied on was the conspiratorial fixing of prices upon corrugated culverts during the period of 1957-1960.

The amounts of the treble damages awarded are as follows: Burleigh County $28,360.35; McClean County $14,300.-73; Stark County $21,755.25; Kidder County $7,082.94; Sheridan County $12,940.38; Golden Valley County $5,-154.39; Hettinger County $1,754.22; Grant County $1,709.43; Oliver County $11,527.02; Wells County $31,630.86.

The questions sought to be raised are controlled by our decisions in Armco Steel Corp. v. State of North Dakota, 8 Cir., 376 F.2d 206, and the Adams County case, supra, and these require af-firmance of the present judgments.

*216 The sum of $300.00 will be allowed appellees in partial printing cost of the supplemental record filed by them. The sum of $1,000.00 will be allowed them as a joint attorney’s fee on the appeal, based upon the considerations which have been set out in our opinion in the Adams County, case, supra. Both allowances will be taxed as costs against appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F.2d 215, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6789, 1967 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armco-steel-corporation-v-burleigh-county-north-dakota-ca8-1967.