Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Armbruster v. State

Armbruster v. State

931 So. 2d 209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9108, 2006 WL 1559748
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 2006
DocketNo. 5D06-370
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 931 So. 2d 209 (Armbruster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armbruster v. State, 931 So. 2d 209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9108, 2006 WL 1559748 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Armbruster (defendant) appeals the trial court’s order denying his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.1 Commendably, the State concedes that the trial court erred by denying the defendant’s motion to amend (which was filed before a ruling on the motion was entered) and his motion for voluntary dismissal of his original rule 3.850 motion. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand with instructions to dismiss the defendant’s initial rule 3.850 motion, without prejudice to defendant filing a timely amended motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Britt v. State
931 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
931 So. 2d 209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9108, 2006 WL 1559748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armbruster-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.