Armbruster v. Armbruster

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armbruster v. Armbruster

166 So. 2d 230, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3960

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 1964·No. No. 63-816·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-husband appeals from that portion of a divorce decree which dealt with the amount of alimony and child support awarded to appellee-wife.

Appellant contends that the chancellor awarded the wife too much, in that, there is not enough money left for appellant to support himself.

The briefs have raised only issues of fact which were decided by the chancellor on conflicting testimony. Our study of the record reveals that there was ample competent evidence to support his award. Appellant has not shown that the chancellor abused his discretion in making the award. Bailey v. Bailey, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 165.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-husband appeals from that portion of a divorce decree which dealt with the amount of alimony and child support awarded to appellee-wife.

Appellant contends that the chancellor awarded the wife too much, in that, there is not enough money left for appellant to support himself.

The briefs have raised only issues of fact which were decided by the chancellor on conflicting testimony. Our study of the record reveals that there was ample competent evidence to support his award. Appellant has not shown that the chancellor abused his discretion in making the award. Bailey v. Bailey, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 165.

Affirmed.

Armbruster v. Armbruster, 166 So. 2d 230, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 3960 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

166 So. 2d 230 (Armbruster v. Armbruster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related