Armas v. Garrett
This text of Armas v. Garrett (Armas v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 CESAR CONTRERAS-ARMAS, Case No. 3:18-cv-00387-HDM-WGC 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. 14 RENEE. BAKER, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time (first request). ECF No. 18 44. Good cause exists to grant the motion. 19 Respondents have filed a motion for leave to file exhibit under seal. ECF No. 42. The 20 exhibit in question is the presentence investigation report, which contains confidential 21 information that might be misused. Compelling reasons exist to grant respondents' motion. See 22 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 23 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time 24 (first request) (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. Petitioner will have up to and including June 25, 25 2021, to file a response to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 35). 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// ] IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents' motion for leave to file exhibit under seal 2 | (ECF No. 42) 1s GRANTED. 3 DATED: May 27, 2021 4 val’ 2 tt HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Armas v. Garrett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armas-v-garrett-nvd-2021.