Armani v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
This text of 690 F. App'x 568 (Armani v. United States District Court for the Central District of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The petition for a writ of mandamus is granted. We vacate the district court’s January 26, 2017 order and direct the district court to enter judgment for the petitioner awarding him payment of his long-term disability benefits, interest, attorney fees, and costs, and reinstatement of the long-term disability policy.
The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court.
PETITION GRANTED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armani-v-united-states-district-court-for-the-central-district-of-ca9-2017.