Armani v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 100379b (or.tax 6-28-2010)

CourtOregon Tax Court
DecidedJune 28, 2010
DocketTC-MD 100379B.
StatusPublished

This text of Armani v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 100379b (or.tax 6-28-2010) (Armani v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 100379b (or.tax 6-28-2010)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armani v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 100379b (or.tax 6-28-2010), (Or. Super. Ct. 2010).

Opinion

DECISION
A case management conference was held June 1, 2010. Mario Armani participated on his own behalf. Tina Burell and Dave Babcock appeared for Defendant.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
The subject property, identified as Account R546717, is a single-family residence located in Gresham, Oregon. For the 2009-10 tax year, Plaintiff appealed to the Multnomah County Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA). The real market value (RMV) for the property was sustained at $291,630. The maximum assessed value (MAV) was upheld at $190,470.

Plaintiff has focused on the increase in his tax bill through the years. His Complaint asks the court to "drop the property taxes, and it should by (sic) no more than $2000/year!" (Ptf's Compl at 1.)

During the case management conference, Plaintiff confirmed he was seeking a decrease to $225,000 RMV as of January 1, 2009.

II. ANALYSIS
Plaintiff seeks a reduction in the RMV from $291,630 to $225,000. Even if he were to receive such relief, the revised total would still lie above the Defendant's record assessed value at $190,470. As such, no tax change would occur and there would be no refund, as confirmed by *Page 2 Defendant at the conference. Therefore, there is no real tax impact to the dispute; Plaintiff is not aggrieved.

So long as the property's maximum assessed value is less than its real market value, the taxpayer is not aggrieved within the meaning of ORS 305.275. Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. Dept. of Rev.,15 OTR 50, 52 (1999).

III. CONCLUSION
Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the appeal is dismissed.

Dated this _____ day of July 2010.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailingto: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or byhand delivery to: Fourth Floor,1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60days after the date of the Decision or this Decision becomesfinal and cannot be changed. This Decision was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattsonon June 28, 2010. The court filed and entered this Decisionon June 28, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks Westsac L.L.C. v. Department of Revenue
15 Or. Tax 50 (Oregon Tax Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Armani v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 100379b (or.tax 6-28-2010), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armani-v-multnomah-county-assessor-tc-md-100379b-ortax-6-28-2010-ortc-2010.