Armando Salazar v. Patricia Salazar
This text of Armando Salazar v. Patricia Salazar (Armando Salazar v. Patricia Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00385-CV
Armando Salazar, Appellant
v.
Patricia Salazar, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 426TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 227-559-E, HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed an unopposed motion asking us to abate the cause so that the
trial court may enter of findings of fact and conclusions of law. He further asks that we extend
the time to file his brief following the entry of the findings and conclusions. We grant the motion
and abate the appeal to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. See
Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Magallanes, 763 S.W.2d 768, 772 (Tex. 1989) (duty to file findings and
conclusions is mandatory). The trial court shall arrange for the filing of a supplemental clerk’s
record containing the findings and conclusions no later than October 4, 2013. Appellant’s brief
will be due seventy-five days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this Court. __________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin
Abated
Filed: August 16, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Armando Salazar v. Patricia Salazar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armando-salazar-v-patricia-salazar-texapp-2013.