Armando Ramos v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 5, 2007
• Docket: 13-07-00125-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBERS

13-07-123-CR

13-07-124-CR

13-07-125-CR

13-07-126-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

---

ARMANDO RAMOS

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

---

On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

---

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ARMANDO RAMOS, attempted to perfect appeals from an order denying motion to recuse entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause numbers 89-CR-679-D, 89-CR-680-D, 89-CR-681-D, and 89-CR-682-D. Appellant has filed a pro se motion for leave to file out-of-time appeal on denial of motion for recusal and request for the record.

Upon review of the documents on file, it appeared that the order from which these appeals are taken is not a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to file a response as requested by this Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant's motion for leave to file out-of-time appeal on denial of motion for recusal and request for the record is DISMISSED. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 5th day of April, 2007.