Armando Ochoa v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 12, 2015·No. 03-14-00740-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

03-14-00740-CR

5242606

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/12/2015 9:43:58 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

No. 03-14-00740-CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE THIRD JUDICIALFILED IN DISTRICT

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

§ AUSTIN, TEXAS v. § COURT OF APPEALS5/12/2015 9:43:58 AM § JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk

ARMANDO OCHOA § AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM APPELLATE REPRESENTATION UNDER ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW, Alexander L. Calhoun, counsel for Appellant, ARMANDO OCHOA, and seeks this Court’s permission to withdraw from representation on the ground that there are no non-frivolous grounds for review in Appellant’s appeal, and would show as follows:

1. Counsel has been appointed to represent Appellant, Mr. Armando Ochoa on appeal form his conviction in the 299th District Court of Travis County Texas, in Cause No. D-1-DC-14-202835, for felony Assault - Family Violence. He has received a sentence of 14 years incarceration.

2. Counsel has thoroughly reviewed the appellate record from Appellant’s trial and believes there to be no non-frivolous grounds for relief in this case. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel has prepared a brief setting forth any possible ground for review and why counsel believes said points to be

frivolous.

3. Counsel would respectfully request this Court to review the submitted Anders Brief and upon conclusion, if this Court concurs with counsel’s reasoning, permit counsel to withdraw from representation, pursuant to Anders v. California, supra. Should this Court conclude that counsel is in error, and that there are non- frivolous grounds within the appellate record, then counsel would seek to withdraw this motion and prepare a merits brief to this Court.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests this Honorable Court, upon review of the accompanying Anders brief, if the Court agrees that there are no non-frivolous grounds for relief, to permit appellate counsel to withdraw. Alternatively, if this Court concludes that there are potentially meritorious issues, then Counsel would seek to withdraw this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

Law Office of Alexander L. Calhoun 4301 W. William Cannon Dr., Ste. B-150 # 260 Austin, Texas 78749

Tele: 512/ 420 - 8850

Fax: 512/ 233- 5946

Cell: 512/ 731 - 3159

email: alcalhoun@earthlink.net

By: _/s/ Alexander L. Calhoun Alexander L. Calhoun

State Bar No.: 00787187

Counsel for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that due to the nature of this brief, I have not sought to confer with opposing counsel and do not anticipate opposition to this motion.

/s/ Alexander L. Calhoun

ALEXANDER L. CALHOUN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I herein certify that on May 12, 2015 a true and correct copy of the above document has been served upon the Travis County District Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 1748, Austin, TX 78767 and that a copy has been served upon Appellant, Armando Ochoa, TDCJ # 01965598, TDCJ - CID Lyncher Unit, 2350 Atascocita Rd., Humble, TX 77396 with an explanation of his right to contest the brief and this motion.

/s/ Alexander L. Calhoun

ALEXANDER L. CALHOUN

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armando Ochoa v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Armando Ochoa v. State (Armando Ochoa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)