Armando Nieves Martinez v. United States

18 F.4th 1164
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2021·No. 19-16953·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO NIEVES MARTINEZ; No. 19-16953 AMELIA PESQUEIRA ORTEGA, on their behalf and on behalf of R.N.P.; D.C. No. ARMANDO NIEVES PESQUEIRA, 4:13-cv-00955-

Plaintiffs-Appellants, CKJ-LAB

v.

ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

Filed December 3, 2021

Before: William A. Fletcher and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Karen E. Schreier,* District Judge.

Order

*

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

2 NIEVES MARTINEZ V. UNITED STATES

ORDER

Judge Ikuta and Judge Schreier have voted to deny appellants’ petition for panel rehearing. Judge Fletcher voted to grant the petition for rehearing. Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Schreier so recommended. Judge Fletcher voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc (Dkt. 47) are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armando Nieves Martinez v. United States, 18 F.4th 1164 (9th Cir. 2021).

18 F.4th 1164 (Armando Nieves Martinez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related