Armando Cubriel, Jr. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 14, 2025·No. 03-24-00293-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 14, 2025

NO. 03-24-00293-CR

Armando Cubriel, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, CRUMP MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE CRUMP

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgments requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment in Count V, for the

offense of retaliation, that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s

judgment and sentence in Count V to reflect that appellant was convicted of a third-degree

felony for that offense. The judgment in Count V, as modified, is affirmed; and the judgments in

Counts I, III, and IV are affirmed, as well. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs,

no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armando Cubriel, Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Armando Cubriel, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Armando Cubriel, Jr. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.